How Much Weight Should Be Given To Pain in Impairment
Ratings?
Whether or not to include PRI in the Guides can be
frames as a qualitative yes or no question. However, it is more fruitful to
from the issue in quantitative terms by asking the following question: How much
weight should be given to pain in impairment ratings? Opponents of PRI, in
effect, argue that pain (and other subjective factors) should be given zero
weight, so that impairment ratings reflect only objective factors. Many
proponents of including PRI in the Guides argue not only that pain
should considered in impairments ratings but also that a PRI system should
permit patients with severe pain to receive impairment awards with high WPI
percentages. An impairment rating system could make a “cautious foray into the
difficult waters” of PRI assessment by permitting awards to be made for PRI,
but capping these awards at a modest level. This describes the strategy used in
the Guides’ Fifth Edition, in which PRI capped at 3% WPI. In the absence
of persuasive empirical research on the extent to which pain affects the ability
of people with medical conditions to function or the measurement problems that
arise when PRI is assessed, any dcision about caps for PRI will be perceived as
arbitrary.
No comments:
Post a Comment